This past week, Oklahoma made a decision that rocked the boat, turning down a whopping $60 million in federal funding for a summer food program. This makes Oklahoma one of 17 states to do so. The reasons behind this bold move stem from concerns about the program’s rules and its potential impact on existing food services for kids. Governor Kevin Stitt expressed contentment with the current state of food services for kids and cast doubt on the need to opt into the new federal program.

The governor’s comments have caused quite a stir, igniting a fiery debate about the harsh reality of food insecurity among Oklahoma’s children. Despite Governor Stitt’s belief that there are adequate resources in place to combat hunger during the summer, the statistics tell a very different story. Oklahoma ranks among the bottom ten for the percentage of kids eligible for free and reduced lunch, with only a dismal 6% of them being able to participate in a summer food program due to lack of access.

The issue of access is particularly glaring in rural areas, where food pantries are scarce as hen’s teeth. While urban areas like Tulsa and Oklahoma City boast more resources, the same cannot be said for their rural cousins. This lack of access shines a spotlight on the struggles faced by kids and families in need of food assistance during the summer months.

Governor Stitt also cited worries about the federal funding being linked to social policies pushed by the Biden Administration. While it’s true that the administration has threatened to withhold funding from schools that are not Title IX compliant, it’s important to note that no school has ever lost federal funding due to Title IX non-compliance in the 50 years of its existence.

The decision to forego the federal funds has sparked controversy and debate among Oklahomans, with many questioning whether it was the right move for the state’s most vulnerable kids. The summer food program could have provided much-needed assistance to children facing hunger during the summer months, and the rejection of the funds represents a missed opportunity to address this pressing issue.

As the conversation around food insecurity in Oklahoma continues, it’s crucial to consider the real-life impact of policy decisions on the well-being of children and families. Access to nutritious meals is a fundamental need, and ensuring that no child goes hungry should be a top priority for state and local leaders. Despite the challenges and uncertainties, there are opportunities to work towards meaningful solutions that benefit the most vulnerable members of our communities.