The demolition of the Pavillon des Sources at the Institut Curie in Paris has ignited a contentious debate, with historical significance and scientific research at the heart of the controversy. The decision to tear down the building, where Pierre and Marie Curie conducted pioneering research on radioactivity, in favor of a new seven-story structure has sparked opposition led by Stéphane Bern, who heads a mission to safeguard French heritage.
The Pavillon des Sources, together with the Pavillon Pasteur and the Pavillon Curie, is an essential part of the Institut Curie. Located in the Latin Quarter on the Sainte-Geneviève mountain, this small brick building dates back to the 20th century and played a critical role in storing raw materials for Marie Curie’s research. The adjacent garden, featuring lime and plane trees planted by Marie Curie, is also included in the controversial project.
Stéphane Bern vehemently opposes the demolition, highlighting the symbolic and memorial value of the building. He emphasizes its historical significance, particularly its association with Marie Curie and the work she and five other Nobel laureates conducted within the pavilion. The struggle to preserve this historical site has garnered international attention and raised concerns about the cultural and intellectual direction of France.
Despite opposition from the Commission du Vieux Paris and various parties, the Institut Curie stands by its decision, citing the building’s pollution and primary use for waste storage. They clarify that the proposed replacement is not an office building but an innovative research laboratory in chemistry and biology, with a focus on cancer research.
The conflict has attracted the attention of President Emmanuel Macron, although his role remains uncertain. Stéphane Bern continues to rally support, advocating for the preservation of the Pavillon des Sources and proposing alternative solutions to the impending demolition. The final decision lies with the government, leaving the future of this historical landmark in limbo.
As the battle to protect the Pavillon des Sources escalates, it prompts us to consider the wider implications of preserving historical and scientific landmarks in the face of progress and development. The outcome of this case will not only shape the future of the Institut Curie but also set a precedent for the protection of historical sites worldwide.
